“Greece may be the canary in the eurozone coal mine,” writes Richard Barley in The Wall Street Journal, “but Italy is the elephant in the room.” While Greece’s boom and bust crisis is “acute”, Italy has more of the “chronic” variety, as “it has barely grown since joining the euro”.
Given the country’s size – it’s the eurozone’s third-largest economy – that’s a bigger fundamental problem than the fate of the smaller, more peripheral Greek economy.
So the good news is that Italy “appears to be emerging from a recession that has lasted for more than three years”, says The Economist. This is due to a combination of “falling oil prices, the European Central Bank’s quantitative easing and a weaker euro”, which are “all doing their bit”. Prime Minister Matteo Renzi “has pencilled in growth for this year of 0.7%”, but “some of his advisers think that will prove an underestimate”.
The government claims that this shows that “reforms Mr Renzi has undertaken over the past 14 months are starting to have an effect”. Buoyed by this, they are considering “easing up on austerity and mulling €1.8bn in new fiscal stimulus measures”, says Giulia Segreti in the FT.
While it plans to cut public spending further next year, this will still bring it “€6bn short of the original three-year plan set by Italy’s former spending tsar in a March 2014 report”. But this may bring Italy into conflict with the EU and the International Monetary Fund, which wants it to “rein in its high levels of public debt”.
The corporate sector is also showing signs of growing confidence, say John Follain and Marco Bertacche on bloomberg.com, as demonstrated by “a boom in mergers and acquisitions in Italy”. Encouragingly, this includes interest from foreign buyers who see value emerging in the economy.
“Deals targeting Italy surged more than 400% year-on-year to a total value of $19.3bn.” This is “more than any other country in the euro region and compares with a 14% increase across Europe as a whole”.
All this may be a sign that Italy is about to “show that it can at least generate cyclical growth”, as Barley puts it. That’s important not just for the country, but for the entire eurozone. “If it doesn’t, expect more questions to be asked about what the single currency does for its members.”