The annual rate of consumer price inflation (CPI) ticked up from 0% to 0.1% between June and July. Core inflation, which strips out volatile food and energy prices, rose from 0.8% to 1.2%, a level last seen in February. Both figures came in slightly higher than forecast, suggesting that interest rates could rise sooner than expected and propelling sterling to a seven-year high in trade-weighted terms (measured against a basket of major trading partners’ currencies).
What the commentators said
The surprise rise in core inflation shows that “domestic demand for goods and services, from consumers and businesses, is reasonably robust”, says Robert Peston on bbc.co.uk. That bodes well for the economy’s continued recovery, but it hardly heralds an “explosive burst” in inflation. Forex investors are jumping the gun, agreed Larry Elliott in The Guardian. The uptick in overall inflation was due to less discounting on the high street in July compared to a year ago.
The bargains were partly brought forward to June this year. Meanwhile, the latest drop in energy and oil prices suggests that CPI will head down again soon: oil is one-fifth cheaper than in June. Domestic energy bills will fall in the autumn. Finally, the trade-weighted pound has gained 6% since the beginning of the year, making imports and manufacturers’ raw materials cheaper. So there is scant sign of underlying inflation.
But we shouldn’t be complacent, warned Kristin Forbes, a member of the Bank of England’s Monetary Policy Committee, in The Daily Telegraph. Interest-rate hikes take “somewhere from one to two years” to kick in properly. Rates will therefore have to rise well before inflation reaches the Bank of England’s 2% target. And while the outlook is currently benign – although annual wage growth is very healthy at 3.3% – it’s important not to fall behind the curve. That would imply steeper hikes later, potentially endangering the recovery.
“The central bank should be thinking now about the road to a more normal monetary policy,” agreed the FT. It is worried that the first rise could have an unusually big impact on an economy addicted to near-zero rates, but holding back for too long is a danger too. Perhaps the Bank should hike by 0.1%, rather than the more usual 0.25%. This would show that the Bank “was unafraid to take action but recognised that reactions might be disproportionate”.