Up until now I’ve generally stayed away from betting on indices, with the exception of last year’s trade on the CAC40 around the time of the French presidential election. This is because it’s much easier to make a case for an individual company than the overall market. Still, I suspect that this month’s tumble won’t be the end of the market turbulence, especially in the US. The main problem is that the S&P 500 is hugely overvalued, both compared with other global markets and its own history.
Admittedly, if you look at some metrics the US market doesn’t appear to be too expensive. For example, the S&P 500 has a price/earnings (p/e) ratio of around 23.5, compared to 23.2 for the United Kingdom, according to Star Capital. Even France and Germany aren’t significantly cheaper. However, if you use a longer-term measure of valuation, such as the cyclically adjusted p/e ratio (Cape), then the US market is nearly double the price of the FTSE. The US market also has one of the lowest dividend yields in the world, one that is half Britain’s 3.6%. Other metrics, such as price/book-value, paint a similar picture.
Investors are complacent
Investors seem to be being more than a little bit complacent and are assuming that the bull market – which has been going on for nearly nine years – will resume. Yet a strong reason to be bearish is that the Federal Reserve seems intent on raising interest rates. One of the big driving forces behind the bull market has been the perception that as soon as the market starts to decline, the Fed will step in.
Yet the Fed seems pretty serious about restoring rates to more normal levels. This is good for the long-term health of the economy, but will force investors to reconsider valuations, exerting downward pressure on stocks. So it seems a good time to go short on the US market.
There are several options for doing this. For example, IG Index offers investors the choice of shorting the Dow Jones at £0.50 per point, the S&P 500 (which it calls the US 500) at £5 per point, or the Nasdaq (aka the Tech 1000) at £2 per point. The Dow Jones is a tricky index to short because it is made up of only 30 companies. By betting against the Nasdaq you’re betting against some of the fastest-growing tech companies. So I suggest that you bet against the S&P 500 at 2,673 for £5 per point. I’d also suggest that you put in a stop-loss at 2,773, around the level of the 50-day moving average. This gives you a potential downside of £500.
Trading techniques: Bollinger bands
Momentum trading relies on buying shares that are doing well and selling those that are doing badly. However, some traders find it more profitable to adopt the opposite strategy – ie, buying during moments of weakness, and selling during moments of strength, in the hope that these fluctuations will be temporary, and that prices will revert to more usual levels. Many of these traders find Bollinger bands a useful tool in deciding whether a share is overbought or oversold – times at which it might make more sense to bet against the trend.
To produce Bollinger bands, take a chart with a simple 20-day moving average of a price and then draw two additional lines, each two standard deviations either side of the original line. The idea is that 95% of the time a share should trade in the area between the two lines. If a share’s price approaches, or even breaks, the upper bound, a trader may consider going short. If the price hits the lower bound, they might consider going long. One point to note is that higher price volatility automatically increases the gap between the two bands.
Surveys indicate that Bollinger bands are one of the most popular strategies among short-term traders. A study by Jiali Fang and Yafeng Quinn of Massey University and Ben Jacobsen of TIAS business school found that following these signals helped traders to make money, especially when the technique was first discovered in the 1980s. However, in recent years they have lost most of their predictive power, especially since John Bollinger – who developed the tool – published a popular book on his strategy in 2001.
How my tips fared
In issue 800 (26 January) I made some major changes to the open positions that I have previously recommended. These included the decision to close my short positions in Tesla and Facebook, and to raise the stop-loss level on my long positions in IG, Petrobras and Renault. So how have these decisions worked out in light of recent market turmoil?
Candidly, the results have not been especially encouraging. The decision to close the shorts in Tesla and Facebook has proved to be particularly unfortunate in terms of timing, since the share prices of both tech firms have since fallen substantially. At the same time, four out of the five long positions have been hit by the dramatic fall in global stockmarkets.
While the trade on spread-betting provider IG Group is still making a relatively healthy profit of £449, the position in French carmaker Renault is now making only £168. Worse, property firm Hammerson is underwater to the tune of £204, while the trade in AA is losing a whopping £455. At 115p, shares in this car-repair service are now close to the stop-loss level of 96.5p.
The only silver lining is that Brazilian oil firm Petrobras has risen in price, so it is now £592.5 in profit. My suggestion that you short bitcoin has also been vindicated by the fact that the dollar price is now nearly $2,000 lower than it was at the end of January, which means that the short position is now a solid £493 in the black.
Overall, my open recommendations are making a total profit of £1,036. Set against a loss of £59 for all my closed positions, this gives a total gain of £977. The only change that I’m going to make is to close my recommendation on AA. Having held the position for six months – and with a substantial dividend cut now looking very likely – it’s time to admit defeat on this particular trade, and move on. However, I’m happy to stick with Hammerson for the time being.