Markets are suffering a real dose of the jitters.
Asian stocks fell this morning. They’re now on track for their longest losing streak in two years, reckons Bloomberg. Meanwhile, both the dollar and yen – the classic ‘risk-aversion’ currencies – picked up.
There’s just too much for investors to fret about. As one worry fades, another reappears. On the one hand, Barack Obama’s banking reforms are being rationalised away. Broker notes are urging us to buy financials, claiming that the reforms probably won’t make it through Congress anyway.
Greece also managed to sell some bonds yesterday (doubtless to the same people who thought that backing the Icelandic banks for an extra percent in interest was a good idea). This buoyed sentiment in the credit markets somewhat.
But now concerns about China tightening up have re-emerged. And investors are right to be worried. The Chinese are walking a tightrope which no central bankers have managed to cross without mishap in the past…
Growth is moving from West to East…
I was at a seminar on China yesterday, hosted by fee-only independent financial advisor Saunderson House. The star attraction was Anthony Bolton. He was talking about his reasons for backing China with his new fund.
Before you ask, he didn’t go into the details of the fund. Those will be out later this year. But in terms of his rationale for investing in China, he made the usual bull points.
He argues that growth is moving from West to East. While we face sclerotic growth in the future, China and emerging markets are set to keep growing rapidly and overtake us at some point. And while Chinese stocks in general are not undervalued by any means, the market is less developed, and thus presents more chances to find quality at low prices.
… but remain sceptical about China
As you might have noticed, we’re somewhat sceptical about the China story (read what Merryn Somerset Webb has to say about it here: My case against China – if you’re not already a subscriber, subscribe to MoneyWeek magazine). And I can’t say I heard much to convince me otherwise. I’m not saying for a moment that Anthony Bolton can’t pick stocks. I’m sure if there are profits to be found in China, then he’s more capable than most of finding them.
However, the trouble with the China story is that the longer-term bull case seems to be based on faith that the authorities can manage the economy in such a way that employment stays high, inflation stays low and growth stays pretty rampant.
For example, the accountant sitting next to me was certain that China was destined for big things in the coming decade. After all, he said, the ruling elites depend so much on continuous economic growth that they’re bound to find a way to keep the show on the road.
But this seems optimistic to the point of naivety. Western capitalist economies can’t prevent booms and busts. Why are the Chinese likely to prove so much better at it?
Special FREE report from MoneyWeek magazine: When will house prices bottom out – and how will you know?
- Why UK property prices are going to fall 50%
- When it will be time to get back in and buy up half price property
We’re not the only sceptics it seems. Markets have been rattled in recent weeks by the prospect of China tightening its monetary policy. The government wants to prevent bubbles from building up – an admirable policy. But the big fear is that they’ll tighten too hard, and derail the whole recovery. According to Reuters, a newspaper report warned that “China’s efforts to curb bank lending were meeting with mixed success, fuelling fears that policymakers may take more aggressive action soon.”
Bringing an economy back down to earth while keeping it ticking along steadily is far easier said than done. As Justin Urquhart Stewart, director at Seven Investment Management, put it: “How do you let the air out of a balloon easily? The answer is with difficulty… there is a level of Chinese uncertainty which hangs as a cloud over us.”
What tighter money in China means for you
How should investors react? Teun Draaisma at Morgan Stanley reckons that you should be selling out of cyclical stocks now. “Sell into strength, as authorities have switched from ‘all-out stimulus’ to ‘let’s start some stimulus withdrawal.’” He points out that tightening need not necessarily take the form of higher interest rates. It “could be many other things including higher taxes, less spending, more regulation, Chinese/Asian tightening,” not to mention Barack Obama’s move to tackle the banks.
Looking at various examples from history, Draaisma reckons that we can expect a “serious double-digit dip lasting two quarters or more,” with an average 25% stock market correction. As Tracy Alloway on FT Alphaville puts it: “The idea then is to get out of the cheap things – the kind of stuff we saw rally in the ‘dash for trash’ – and switch into ‘strength,’ that is, high quality, reliable growth stocks, plus bonds and cash.”
Britain’s emerged from recession – but keep playing it safe
And this morning, we had more evidence that investors might well be disappointed by growth elsewhere in the world this year. As we note below, Britain emerged from recession in the fourth quarter of 2009 – but only just. Growth came in at a pitiful 0.1%, compared to expectations for 0.4%. As Capital Economics put it: “With household incomes under pressure, credit in short supply and a major fiscal squeeze looming, the path to a full recovery is going to be a long and bumpy one.”
That’s another good argument for playing it safe. In this week’s issue of MoneyWeek, our Roundtable experts pick out some of the stocks that they believe can weather the uncertainty ahead. (You can subscribe to MoneyWeek magazine).
Our recommended article for today
Things
are about to get worse for the housing market
In the past 18 months, mortgage interest rates have more than halved. But now they’re on their way back up again. Merryn
Somerset Webb explains what this means for the housing market.