Governments love capitalism. As long as asset prices are rising, that is.
When prices are rising, governments will do anything to keep them up there. You want free money? We’ll keep interest rates low. You want light-touch regulation? We’ll give you off-balance sheet finance.
The deal between banks and governments in the past decade or so has been simple. “You lot keep the voters happy and feeling rich,” says the government. “And we’ll give you a nice cosy, risk-free world to play in.” Of course, capitalism without risk, is not capitalism at all. What we’ve had is sugar-daddy socialism, with the financial industry frolicking freely, safe in the knowledge that there’s always a bail-out around the corner.
But you can’t buck the market forever. And even though there have been plenty of bail-outs, prices just keep on falling. Yet governments don’t seem to learn…
Chaos in emerging markets
Yesterday I pointed out how Hank Paulson’s U-turn on the Tarp highlighted the dangers of government interference in the markets . But you can get a much clearer idea of how the state can make a bad situation worse by looking at the havoc in emerging markets.
Like Western investors, investors in emerging markets came to believe that asset prices could only ever go up. And so when they fall, they start looking around for someone to blame.
That’s why Kuwait’s stock market (which has fallen by more than 40% since late June) was shut down yesterday. According to The Telegraph, an investor had filed a claim “over the heavy losses he had suffered on the exchange.” So the court stopped it from trading until Monday, finding that “the bourse management failed to take any measures to boost a flagging market.”
I imagine that the management didn’t realise that this was part of their remit, any more than the owner of a fruit and veg stall’s pitch would expect to have to keep the price of apples high.
Enjoying this article? Sign up for our free daily email, Money Morning, to receive intelligent investment advice every weekday. Sign up to Money Morning.
The dangers of too much government intervention
But the plight of Russia probably demonstrates best the dangers of too much government intervention. The Russian Micex market has been the worst performing in the second half of this year so far, reports The Telegraph. Stocks have fallen by 75% since May.
A key problem for Russia is that it is massively dependent on oil. Its 2009 budget only balances if oil is trading at an average $95 a barrel. I can’t see that happening. So its markets and the rouble have come under pressure with falling oil prices. And of course, as an emerging market, it has taken a hit as investors pull their money out and repatriate it to the ‘safe haven’ of the US.
But the state’s attempts to prevent the crisis with brute force, have only made things worse. The central bank has already had to spend $120bn of its reserves on defending the rouble, which analysts reckon is now 30% over-valued. This is just a waste of money. When a country, particularly a politically risky country like Russia, starts defending its currency, it’s a sure sign to the market that said currency is over-valued. No central bank in the world has enough reserves to defend against a forex market set on helping a currency to find its “real” worth.
Let’s hope our governments learn to accept falling prices
The state is also making the stock market plunge worse than it has to be. They keep shutting the market because it keeps falling so hard. But a big part of the reason that it keeps falling so hard is because every time they open it, investors think “Quick! Let’s sell before they shut it again!”
If you limit the trading that can be done, you increase the liquidity risk. Anyone who is scared they might need cash at short notice isn’t going to be happy to hold stocks that can only be easily traded as and when the government says it’s OK to do so.
All these measures rattle investor confidence further, and make it even harder to price genuine risk. At some point, most assets of any real value at all will reach a price at which fundamentals suggest they are worth buying. But if you have to worry about the government’s random reactions to such falls as well, it becomes impossible to make any kind of judgement based on these fundamentals.
So we’d better get used to falling prices – and let’s hope our governments learn to accept them as well.
Our recommended article for today
How the Federal Reserve has shifted its focus
The US Federal Reserve has rewritten its mission and is now sailing in uncharted waters. And while the US dollar may be on a high right now, the Fed’s actions could have dire consequences for the greenback.