The horrible truth about inflation – it just won’t go away

This feature is part of our FREE daily Money Morning email. If you’d like to sign up, please click here:

Sign up for Money Morning






‘Horrible.” “Shocking.” “Terrible.”

No, it’s not the response to the Archbishop of Canterbury’s latest lecture. These are just some of the words used by analysts to describe January’s data on producer price inflation.

The price paid for goods leaving factories rose 5.7% year on year, which is the highest rate since 1991. Wholesale food prices were up 8.5%, while petrol prices were up by almost 23%. Overall, input prices were up an incredible 18.9%.

There was some comfort in the fact that this morning’s consumer price index reading, rising at an annual rate of 2.2%, was lower than expected. But with input prices rising so rapidly, and the pound weakening, it remains to be seen how long that can be sustained.

It looks like interest rates might not be falling as rapidly as the City had hoped…

Inflation is still very much a threat, despite the impending global slowdown. And most worrying about yesterday’s inflation figures, says Tom Stevenson in The Telegraph, was the fact that it’s not all about food and energy prices anymore. “Import prices… are also on the move.”

Cheap imports, mainly from China, have been one of the main reasons that the Bank of England has been able to keep interest rates down without sparking inflation. Basically, life has been getting a lot more expensive for services you can’t outsource – like hairdressing and education. But cheap TVs, clothes and shoes have offset that.

But with inflation rising sharply in China, and the pound weakening, imports won’t stay cheap for long. And as the UK consumer runs out of steam, retailers – just like mortgage providers – will stop chasing market share and start chasing profits again, as rising prices from suppliers force them to pass their costs on.

Just in passing, it does make you wonder if the way we look at inflation is fundamentally flawed. Is it a bad thing if the price of shoes falls? Well, no, because that represents the benefits of higher productivity – you get more for spending less.

And is it a good thing that the price of houses rockets? Well, no, because you end up spending more on an asset that is no better than it was ten years ago – in fact, it’s worse because it’s older. It means that people like hairdressers and other local service providers end up charging more so that they can afford accommodation. So arguably, setting an inflation target that ignores house prices, but treats falling shoe prices as the enemy, is pretty stupid. This whole subject is a can of worms all by itself, but I’ll try to look at it in more depth, in a future Money Morning.

Hugo Chavez’s empty threats on oil

Meanwhile, helping inflation along was Venezuelan president Hugo Chavez. The populist prattler was back in the news with his threat to stop sending oil to the US, amid ExxonMobil’s attempts to freeze £12bn of assets in a state oil company. This was picked up as a reason for the price of oil rising, but if it hadn’t been pinned on Mr Chavez, it would have been pinned on something else, like rumblings in Nigeria or jitters in the Middle East.

As Cyrus Sanati points out on Breakingviews.com, Mr Chavez’s threat will come to nothing. Most of Venezuela’s oil is very heavy, and needs sophisticated refineries to break it down. And that’s why 75% of its oil goes to the US. On the other side of the equation, Venezuelan oil accounts for just 13% of the oil the US imports.

So if Venezuela pulled the plug on the US, Mr Chavez would find himself without a market, while the US would rapidly find a replacement oil supply and could in the meantime rely on its strategic oil reserve to fill the gap.

Mr Chavez’s little outburst is probably more of a distraction technique for the wider electorate. A bit of anti-US drum-banging always goes down well – but it’s never a good idea to pick battles you can’t win.

Of course, Mr Chavez is by no means the only politician to indulge in distraction tactics. Yesterday we heard from George Bush that the US economy is “structurally sound for the long term”, while Chancellor Alistair Darling has been talking about the UK’s “sound fundamentals” ever since Northern Rock took a tumble.

As we all know, a long-term investment is simply a short-term one that hasn’t worked out. So when Mr Bush says the US is “structurally sound for the long term”, what he really means is “and in the short-term we’re in deep trouble. But I won’t be president anymore, so good luck with that.”

Turning to the wider markets…


Enjoying this article? Why not sign up to receive

Money Morni

ng FREE every weekday? Just click here: FREE daily Money Morning email



Insurers weigh on indices


In London, insurer Resolution – closely followed by peers Old Mutual and Aviva – led the blue-chips lower yesterday following revelations of credit default troubles at US counterpart American International Group. The FTSE 100 index closed 76 points lower at 5,707. For a full market report, see: London market close


On the Continent, the Paris CAC-40 fell 26 points to end the day at 4,682. In Frankfurt, the DAX-30 was down 23 points, at 6,743.

Across the Atlantic, early falls prompted by AIG’s news were later cancelled out by strength in the technology sector as Yahoo’s rejection of Microsoft’s $44.6bn takeover approach prompted hopes of a higher offer to follow. The Dow Jones added 57 points to close at 12,240. The tech-rich Nasdaq was 15 points higher at 2,320. And the broader S&P 500 was 7 points higher at 1,339.

In Asia, the

Japanese Nikkei was up 4 points, at 13,021 and the Hang Seng was 305 points higher, at 22,921.

Xstrata rejects Brazilian bid

Crude oil had fallen back to $93.16 this morning, following yesterday’s $2 rally in New York. In London, meanwhile, Brent spot was flat at $93.45.

Spot gold had risen to $924.20 this morning. Silver hit a 27-year peak of $17.60.

And platinum rose to a fresh record high of $1,965.

Turning to forex, the

pound was at 1.9446 against the dollar and 1.3399 against the euro. And the dollar was at 0.6888 against the euro and 106.98 against the Japanese yen.

And in London this morning, shares in miner Xstrata fell by as much as 2% this morning on reports in the FT that the miner had rejected a $76m bid from Brazilian iron ore producer Cia. Vale do Rio Doce.

Our recommended articles for today…

Markets: prepare for a rough ride ahead
– We have been experiencing the first bouts of major bear-market panic, but the US Fed has run out of firepower with which to fight the crisis. MartinSpring explains why we should all prepare for a long and painful period of readjustment – but why there is light at the end of the tunnel – here: Markets: prepare for a rough ride ahead

How to clean up with renewable energy
– The world’s energy demands are set to jump by 50% over the next 20 years. Now, the Kyoto protocol is encouraging countries to focus on alternative power generation. Click here to read this MoneyWeek cover story, just available to non-subscribers, in which Tim Bennett reveals which renewables look most viable, and where exactly the ‘wave of capital’ earmarked for renewable energy projects is heading: How to clean up with renewable energy


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *