Another central bank has ploughed its way further into negative interest rate territory.
Sweden’s Riksbank has cut its benchmark interest rate from -0.35% to -0.5%. That was a tougher cut than markets had expected (they’d been predicting negative 0.45% – as you can see, that little tenth of a half of a percent makes all the difference).
Anyway, the krona slid as a result, which should keep the central bank happy. The Riksbank has already made it explicit that it views a weak krona as a key part of its goal to boost Swedish inflation.
How long is it before the rest of the central banks follow suit?
What can a central bank do?
Sweden’s Riksbank made it very clear that – like every other central bank in the world – it will do what it takes to get inflation back up to its target of 2%. Right now it’s 0.1%. Hence the further drive into negative territory this morning.
As Jim Edwards on Business Insider points out, this might not be fuelling consumer price inflation. But it’s certainly fuelling asset price inflation. Swedish house price growth is running at an annual rate of around 25%. Meanwhile credit growth is running at around 7% a year.
Does that sound like an economy with problems to you? Well, yes – but the problem is a property bubble, not low inflation.
The Riksbank has noticed this. But as Katie Martin notes in the FT, “in another familiar refrain, the central bank also once again called on regulators to take action to control rising levels of Swedish household debt”.
Quoth the Riksbank: “If no measures are taken, this, in combination with the low interest-rate level, will further increase the risks. Such a development could ultimately be very costly for the national economy.”
Gosh. The central bank has figured out that a massive property crash in the future, that could cripple both bank and consumer balance sheets and probably send the economy back to the stone age yet again, would be a “bad thing”.
If only the central bank had some sort of lever that it could pull to prevent credit from being too loose. If only someone responsible was in charge of controlling – I don’t know – the money supply, maybe.
I think that – perhaps more than any other central bank in the world – the Riksbank is demonstrating the huge problem with the amount of responsibility that we’ve collectively dumped on central banks’ shoulders.
In this particular circumstance, the last thing Sweden – and its property market – needs, is more heavily negative interest rates. The economy is growing strongly. Does the fact that inflation is near 0% really matter that much?
But to be fair, you can also see the Riksbank’s dilemma. As Jessica Hinds puts it for Capital Economics, it demonstrates that the bank “is prepared to set aside its worries about a housing-market bubble and strong domestic demand to respond to very low inflation and policy easing by central banks.”
And it’s going to have to keep going, says Hinds: “With other central banks – most notably the European Central Bank (ECB) – likely to loosen monetary policy further in the coming months, we doubt that the recent falls in the krona will be sustained”.
This is a competition. It’s a race to the bottom. And it’s getting more brutal by the day.
Wait until the big boys let rip in the currency wars
Now Sweden vs the world is one thing. But it’s happening on a much bigger scale too.
The Bank of Japan shocked everyone the other week by turning interest rates negative. But while central bank boss Haruhiko Kuroda might have thought he’d made a smart move, it turns out to be nothing of the kind.
US Federal Reserve boss Janet Yellen hinted yesterday that the Fed was probably going to ease back on the throttle for a bit. And as a result of that – and as a result of general risk aversion, which tends to send money into the yen – the yen has rocketed in strength against the US dollar.
Against the US currency, year to date, the yen is by far the strongest performer – up nearly 8%.
That’s not part of the plan. Abenomics was founded on a weaker yen, and while the Japanese might have been happy stabilising around the ¥120 mark, they certainly won’t be happy about being around the ¥111 mark and heading for ¥100, as we’re seeing this morning.
As for the euro – a weaker currency there has been part of the game plan for ages too. Dollar parity? Bring it on. Well, that’s not going according to plan, either.
Sign our petition to save cash
Basically, if you think that central bank activism can’t get any crazier, just imagine a world full of Riksbanks. Because that’s what we’re going to get.
And negative interest rates are just the start. The Riksbank was one of the pioneers in the thought experiment of banning cash. If you want negative interest rates to work, then you have to stop those pesky citizens from using and hoarding cash.
It sounds outlandish, but don’t imagine that it can’t happen. As we’ve mentioned on several occasions, our own Bank of England’s chief economist, Andy Haldane, floated it as a good idea last year, and the opinion pages of the FT and Bloomberg have recently contained several pieces on why banning cash is a good idea.
I write a lot more on this in a lot more detail in the next issue of MoneyWeek magazine, out tomorrow. (Subscribe here.)
But if you haven’t already, it’d be great if you could sign our petition, asking the government to confirm that it won’t scrap cash and to take another look at the remit of the Bank of England.
We’re about halfway to the 10,000 mark, at which point the government has to at least respond to our concerns. And if I’m honest, I’m just bursting with curiosity to see what they’d say – if you are too, put your name to the petition. Just click here.
This article is taken from our FREE daily investment email Money Morning.
Every day, MoneyWeek’s executive editor John Stepek and guest contributors explain how current economic and political developments are affecting the markets and your wealth, and give you pointers on how you can profit.
.