Apple’s fall is just a symptom – here’s what’s really troubling the market

Apple’s iPhone isn’t selling in the numbers it used to

This article is taken from our FREE daily investment email Money Morning.

Every day, MoneyWeek’s executive editor John Stepek and guest contributors explain how current economic and political developments are affecting the markets and your wealth, and give you pointers on how you can profit.

Sign up free here.

In this week’s issue of MoneyWeek magazine

China: Asia’s next success story

The two faces of Emmanuel Macron

When director deals matter

Hungary: nasty leader, nice stocks

Renewable energy funds are warming up

● Share tips of the week

Not a subscriber? Sign up here

Markets are rattled again.
This time, fear has coalesced around smartphone giant Apple. The world’s first trillion-dollar company is no longer a trillion-dollar company, and yesterday it fell even further from regaining its crown.
Apple lost 5%, while the wider S&P 500 shed 2%.
This November rebound is looking pretty ropey right now.
It’s peak iPhone all over again
The idea of “peak iPhone” has been a threat to Apple for as long as I can remember. It’s no secret that the tech giant is dependent on its upmarket smartphones for the lion’s share of its profits.
Apple’s share price peaked at just over $232 a share at the start of last month. But at the start of this month, the company took a major hit as it gave a lacklustre outlook for the Christmas period, and also surprised markets by saying that it will no longer report on individual unit sales for iPhones, iPads and Macs.
Now, when a company stops reporting figures that it knows analysts pay a lot of attention to, we all know that can only mean one thing – that it doesn’t want them to pay attention to those figures any more. And the only feasible reason for doing that is because the company expects those figures to go in the wrong direction.

To be fair, iPhone sales have been pretty flat for the past three years. Peak iPhone sales actually came in 2015, at 231.2 million. In 2016, they fell to 211.9 million. In 2017, they rose to 216.8 million. And for the 2018 fiscal year (to 30 September) they hit 217.7 million.
And of course, Apple keeps selling more expensive versions of the iPhone. So sales might be flat, but revenues keep going up.
So you can see why Apple might want to kill off the focus on actual iPhone unit sales. The iPhone is a luxury item – you pay a premium for the brand, even although you can get a phone that’s just as good in pure power terms, for a lower price elsewhere.
(You might favour Apple’s ecosystem or user-friendliness, but that’s akin to enjoying the experience of shopping in a designer shop for a fancy handbag, when you can get one that holds more stuff in your local Asda.)
You could certainly argue that it’s hard to be both a mass-market and a luxury brand, particularly once your new phones start to break the four-figure price mark.
Yet Apple has managed to have its cake and eat it on this front for years now, which is one reason that it became the world’s first trillion-dollar company. So you can see why investors might not welcome the idea that iPhone sales might dip.
Which is probably why they reacted so badly when two iPhone suppliers issued gloomy updates yesterday.
Lumentum, which supplies sensors for iPhones, warned that one of its “largest industrial and consumer customers” had cancelled a lot of previously booked orders. The share price fell by a third.
Lumentum didn’t name Apple. But it’s not hard to take an educated guess. Particularly as another big supplier to Apple – Japan Display – also warned on profits due to “volatile customer demand”, notes the FT.
What’s really eating away at the market
How important is all of this stuff? The reality is that this isn’t the first time in the history of the iPhone that wobbles over demand have hit Apple.
However, the problem is that the tone of the market has changed. Things it would have brushed off in the recent past are now bothering it. Apple is not the only one.
Goldman Sachs, for example, had a terrible day yesterday, falling by 7.5%. Investors are getting worried about the implications of the 1MDB scandal (basically an epic and complex scandal involving a Malaysian state investment fund which a couple of Goldman Sachs executives have been implicated in).
Again, this is the sort of news that markets – in a different mood – would have shrugged off. It’s not as though Goldman hasn’t been involved in controversy in the past. Yet investors are now so nervous that they are paying attention to any news that is less than perfect.
You can point to all sorts of bad news, but what it fundamentally comes down to is that central banks globally are tightening up, and the Federal Reserve is in the lead, which makes things even worse, because it means a stronger dollar.
Italy is mostly a problem right now because the European Central Bank is getting tighter, not looser. Minor disappointments and nasty but hardly unique scandals are problems right now because the Fed is getting tighter, not looser.
Until this year, the market felt comfortable with the idea that it had a great big mattress underneath it – that if stocks fell too hard, they would be cushioned by fresh waves of cheap money.
That’s no longer the case. And while my base case scenario remains that we have at least one last gasp left in this bull market, I reckon it’s going to take some serious good news – or at least a hint of a pause from the Fed – to pull the market decisively out of this particular glum mood.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *